Ghosh; Avik
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ghosh; Avik.The latest application filed is for "extremely large spin hall angle in topological insulator pn junction".
- Ghosh; Avik - Bangalore IN
- Ghosh; Avik - Charlottesville VA
- Ghosh; Avik - Irvine CA
- Ghosh; Avik - Monterey Park CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Determining product attribute sequences using quantitative values Grant 10,943,286 - Ghosh , et al. March 9, 2 | 2021-03-09 |
| Extremely large spin hall angle in topological insulator pn junction Grant 9,865,713 - Habib , et al. January 9, 2 | 2018-01-09 |
| Graphene device including angular split gate Grant 9,570,559 - Sajjad , et al. February 14, 2 | 2017-02-14 |
| Extremely Large Spin Hall Angle In Topological Insulator Pn Junction App 20160351696 - Habib; K M Masum ; et al. | 2016-12-01 |
| Device For Braced Frame Assembly And Method Of Using Same App 20090257821 - Ghosh; Avik ; et al. | 2009-10-15 |
| Monolithically-Integrated Graphene-Nano-Ribbon (GNR) Devices, Interconnects and Circuits App 20090174435 - Stan; Mircea R. ; et al. | 2009-07-09 |
| Moment resisting frame bearing connector App 20060193687 - Ghosh; Avik | 2006-08-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 