loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Getz; Edward H..The latest application filed is for "psc motor for automatic washer".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
PSC motor for automatic washer Grant 5,166,568 - Nystuen , et al. November 24, 1 | 1992-11-24 |
Motor control circuit for automatic washer Grant 4,972,134 - Getz , et al. November 20, 1 | 1990-11-20 |
Variable motor speed control for automatic washer Grant 4,950,969 - Getz August 21, 1 | 1990-08-21 |
Automatic vacuum nozzle height adjustment system for vacuum cleaner Grant 4,706,327 - Getz , et al. November 17, 1 | 1987-11-17 |
Microcomputer control system for a canister vacuum cleaner Grant 4,654,924 - Getz , et al. April 7, 1 | 1987-04-07 |
Automatic temperature control for automatic washers Grant 4,528,709 - Getz , et al. July 16, 1 | 1985-07-16 |
Automatic liquid level control for automatic washers Grant 4,480,449 - Getz , et al. November 6, 1 | 1984-11-06 |
Automatic liquid level control for automatic washers Grant 4,428,088 - Getz , et al. January 31, 1 | 1984-01-31 |
Low voltage sensor for dryer Grant 4,385,452 - Deschaaf , et al. May 31, 1 | 1983-05-31 |
Dryness Sensor Grant 3,600,819 - Getz , et al. August 24, 1 | 1971-08-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.