loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Georgiadis; Steve.The latest application filed is for "noodle comprised of a matrix of discontinuous filaments".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Noodle comprised of a matrix of discontinuous filaments Grant 11,427,687 - Glynn , et al. August 30, 2 | 2022-08-30 |
Noodle Comprised of a Matrix of Discontinuous Filaments App 20210253807 - Glynn; Andrew K. ;   et al. | 2021-08-19 |
Curved aircraft substructure repair systems and methods Grant 10,392,132 - Batzakis , et al. A | 2019-08-27 |
Curved Aircraft Substructure Repair Systems And Methods App 20180029725 - Batzakis; Nicholas ;   et al. | 2018-02-01 |
Noodle Comprised of a Matrix of Discontinuous Filaments App 20170029577 - Glynn; Andrew K. ;   et al. | 2017-02-02 |
Flexible truss frame and method of making the same Grant 9,302,759 - Glynn , et al. April 5, 2 | 2016-04-05 |
Flexible Truss Frame and Method of Making the Same App 20140117159 - Glynn; Andrew K. ;   et al. | 2014-05-01 |
Flexible truss frame and method of making the same Grant 8,651,419 - Glynn , et al. February 18, 2 | 2014-02-18 |
Flexible Truss Frame and Method of Making the Same App 20130020438 - Glynn; Andrew K. ;   et al. | 2013-01-24 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.