Genise; David G.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Genise; David G..The latest application filed is for "hydraulic lash compensation device with mechanical lift loss feature".
- Genise; David G. - Marshall MI
- Genise; David G. - Turin IT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Hydraulic lash compensation device with mechanical lift loss feature Grant 7,543,555 - Genise June 9, 2 | 2009-06-09 |
| Hydraulic Lash Compensation Device With Mechanical Lift Loss Feature App 20090031976 - Genise; David G. | 2009-02-05 |
| Dual lift rocker arm latch mechanism and actuation arrangement therefor Grant 7,318,402 - Harman , et al. January 15, 2 | 2008-01-15 |
| Dual lift rocker arm latch mechanism and actuation arrangement therefor App 20070113809 - Harman; Andrew P. ; et al. | 2007-05-24 |
| Valve control system including deactivating rocker arm Grant 7,121,241 - Genise , et al. October 17, 2 | 2006-10-17 |
| Stamped two-step rocker arm component Grant 7,089,899 - Genise , et al. August 15, 2 | 2006-08-15 |
| Valve train assembly Grant 6,612,277 - Genise September 2, 2 | 2003-09-02 |
| Valve train assembly App 20030010305 - Genise, David G. | 2003-01-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 