Geller; Myer
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Geller; Myer.The latest application filed is for "multi-channel, covert, non-line-of-sight uv communication".
- Geller; Myer - San Diego CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Multi-channel, covert, non-line-of-sight UV communication Grant 5,301,051 - Geller April 5, 1 | 1994-04-05 |
| Mid range UV communications Grant 5,062,154 - Geller , et al. October 29, 1 | 1991-10-29 |
| Narrow spectral bandwidth, UV solar blind detector Grant 4,731,881 - Geller March 15, 1 | 1988-03-15 |
| Optical non-line-of-sight covert, secure high data communication system Grant 4,493,114 - Geller , et al. January 8, 1 | 1985-01-08 |
| Pulsed laser excitation source Grant 4,035,691 - Altman , et al. July 12, 1 | 1977-07-12 |
| Three-dimensional Storage System Using F-centers Grant 3,654,626 - Geller , et al. April 4, 1 | 1972-04-04 |
| Selectively Controllable Radiant Energy Device Grant 3,611,191 - Altman , et al. October 5, 1 | 1971-10-05 |
| Pulse-charging Coupling Laser Apparatus Grant 3,571,745 - Altman , et al. March 23, 1 | 1971-03-23 |
| Pulsed Laser Apparatus Grant 3,571,746 - DeTemple , et al. March 23, 1 | 1971-03-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 