loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gehrke; Glenn F..The latest application filed is for "universal joint assembly".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Universal joint assembly Grant 7,147,564 - Gehrke December 12, 2 | 2006-12-12 |
Universal joint assembly App 20050288106 - Gehrke, Glenn F. | 2005-12-29 |
High speed high angle universal joint App 20050239560 - Gehrke, Glenn F. | 2005-10-27 |
Retained needle thrust washer Grant 5,813,916 - Lentini , et al. September 29, 1 | 1998-09-29 |
Universal joint wear indicator Grant 5,718,633 - Gehrke February 17, 1 | 1998-02-17 |
Axial retaining member and method for interconnecting male and female splined members Grant 4,813,808 - Gehrke March 21, 1 | 1989-03-21 |
Axial retaining member Grant 4,756,640 - Gehrke July 12, 1 | 1988-07-12 |
Constant velocity universal joint Grant 4,573,947 - Hazebrook , et al. March 4, 1 | 1986-03-04 |
Constant velocity universal joint Grant 4,511,346 - Hazebrook , et al. April 16, 1 | 1985-04-16 |
Venting arrangement for stroking universal joint Grant 4,224,808 - Gehrke September 30, 1 | 1980-09-30 |
Splined Assembly With Retaining Rings Grant 3,832,076 - Gehrke August 27, 1 | 1974-08-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.