GEA LYOPHIL GMBH
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for GEA LYOPHIL GMBH.The latest application filed is for "a freeze dryer and a method for inducing nucleation in products".
- GEA LYOPHIL GMBH - Hurth DE
- GEA Lyophil GmbH - DE DE
- GEA LYOPHIL GmbH -
Trademarks
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Freeze dryer and a method for inducing nucleation in products Grant 11,047,620 - Beutler , et al. June 29, 2 | 2021-06-29 |
| A Freeze Dryer And A Method For Inducing Nucleation In Products App 20200248963 - Kind Code | 2020-08-06 |
| Unloading device featuring vacuum suction Grant 10,005,621 - Strauch , et al. June 26, 2 | 2018-06-26 |
| Unloading Device Featuring Vacuum Suction App 20160304291 - Strauch; Harald ; et al. | 2016-10-20 |
| Apparatus for loading and unloading freeze-drying chambers Grant 7,695,230 - Selch April 13, 2 | 2010-04-13 |
| Method for the operation of freeze-drying equipment with a chamber and with loading and unloading devices, including equipment of this kind appropriately designed for such purpose App 20060254076 - Kluetsch; Hubert ; et al. | 2006-11-16 |
| NCAGE Code | CJ827 | GEA LYOPHIL GMBH |
| CAGE Code | CJ827 | GEA LYOPHIL GMBH |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 