loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gavagan; James A..The latest application filed is for "shoulder belt comfort mechanism".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Shoulder belt comfort mechanism Grant 5,054,815 - Gavagan October 8, 1 | 1991-10-08 |
Visor with snap-in retractable glare shield Grant 4,952,008 - Lobanoff , et al. August 28, 1 | 1990-08-28 |
Dual spool retractor with comfort limiting mechanism Grant 4,896,844 - Gavagan , et al. January 30, 1 | 1990-01-30 |
Hinge assembly for vehicle visor and other vehicle accessories Grant 4,821,374 - Gavagan April 18, 1 | 1989-04-18 |
Illumination for vehicle accessories Grant 4,788,630 - Gavagan November 29, 1 | 1988-11-29 |
Vehicle accessory assembly for mounting on a visor or other interior panel Grant 4,721,310 - Gavagan , et al. January 26, 1 | 1988-01-26 |
Free standing sunshade assembly Grant 4,707,018 - Gavagan November 17, 1 | 1987-11-17 |
Compartment shade Grant 4,482,137 - Gavagan , et al. November 13, 1 | 1984-11-13 |
Safety seat belt buckle switch with coil spring contact Grant 4,015,094 - Gavagan , et al. March 29, 1 | 1977-03-29 |
Six-way Seat Track Grant 3,662,984 - Robinson , et al. May 16, 1 | 1972-05-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.