loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Garadnay; Sandor.The latest application filed is for "industrial process for the preparation of cariprazine".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Industrial process for the preparation of cariprazine Grant 11,274,087 - Neu , et al. March 15, 2 | 2022-03-15 |
Industrial Process For The Preparation Of Cariprazine App 20210276965 - Neu; Jozsef ;   et al. | 2021-09-09 |
Process For The Preparation Of High-purity Prasugrel App 20190211029 - NEU; Jozsef ;   et al. | 2019-07-11 |
Polymorphs Of 5--6-chloro-1,3-dihydro-2h-indol-2-one Hydrobromide And Processes For Preparation Thereof App 20100081668 - Neu; Jozsef ;   et al. | 2010-04-01 |
Novel Process For Production Of 5--6-chloro-1,3-dihydro-2h-indol-2-one (ziprasidone) App 20090111988 - Neu; Jozsef ;   et al. | 2009-04-30 |
PROCESS FOR MAKING POLYMORPH FROM I OF (S) - (+) -METHYL-ALPHA- (2-CHLOROPHENYL) -6, 7-DYHIDRO-THIENO- [3, 2-c] PYRIDINE-5 (4H) -ACETATE HYDROGEN SULFATE App 20090093635 - Garadnay; Sandor ;   et al. | 2009-04-09 |
Novel Process for Production of Highly Pure Polymorph (I) Donepezil Hydrochloride App 20080306271 - Neu; Jozsef ;   et al. | 2008-12-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.