Gamble; Thomas
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gamble; Thomas.The latest application filed is for "data entity revisions for an offline database".
- Gamble; Thomas - Atlanta GA
- Gamble; Thomas - Duluth GA US
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Optimistic product order reservation system and method Grant 11,430,048 - Ramamurthy , et al. August 30, 2 | 2022-08-30 |
| Data Entity Revisions for an Offline Database App 20220020080 - Ramamurthy; Hari ; et al. | 2022-01-20 |
| Floor cable cover for power and communications cables Grant D934,184 - Gamble October 26, 2 | 2021-10-26 |
| Optimistic Product Order Reservation System And Method App 20200104905 - Ramamurthy; Hari ; et al. | 2020-04-02 |
| Optimistic product order reservation system and method Grant 10,497,049 - Ramamurthy , et al. De | 2019-12-03 |
| Floor cable cover for heavy-use environments Grant 10,153,627 - Gamble Dec | 2018-12-11 |
| Offline Product Order Reservation System And Method App 20170255991 - Ramamurthy; Hari ; et al. | 2017-09-07 |
| Optimistic Product Order Reservation System And Method App 20170255990 - Ramamurthy; Hari ; et al. | 2017-09-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 