Gajek; Richard T.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gajek; Richard T..The latest application filed is for "zeolite beta and its use in aromatic alkylation".
- Gajek; Richard T. - Daphne AL
- Gajek; Richard T. - New Fairfield CT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Zeolite beta and its use in aromatic alkylation Grant 6,440,886 - Gajda , et al. August 27, 2 | 2002-08-27 |
| Zeolite beta and its use in aromatic alkylation Grant 6,162,416 - Gajda , et al. December 19, 2 | 2000-12-19 |
| Zeolite beta and its use in aromatic alkylation Grant 5,723,710 - Gajda , et al. March 3, 1 | 1998-03-03 |
| Modified zeolite beta, processes for preparation and use thereof Grant 5,522,984 - Gajda , et al. June 4, 1 | 1996-06-04 |
| Boron-aluminum-phosphorus-silicon-oxide molecular sieve compositions Grant 5,057,295 - Flanigen , et al. October 15, 1 | 1991-10-15 |
| Microporous crystalline composite compositions Grant 4,861,739 - Pellet , et al. August 29, 1 | 1989-08-29 |
| Crystalline aluminophosphate compositions Grant 4,473,663 - Patton , et al. September 25, 1 | 1984-09-25 |
| Crystalline silicoaluminophosphates Grant 4,440,871 - Lok , et al. April 3, 1 | 1984-04-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 