Gadot; Harel
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gadot; Harel.The latest application filed is for "modular robotic system for driving movement of surgical tools".
- Gadot; Harel - Hingham MA
- Gadot; Harel - New York NY
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Modular robotic system for driving movement of surgical tools Grant 11,241,291 - Sharon , et al. February 8, 2 | 2022-02-08 |
| Modular Robotic System For Driving Movement Of Surgical Tools App 20210282875 - SHARON; Simon ; et al. | 2021-09-16 |
| Self-cleaning Catheter Systems App 20210046277 - SAMOOCHA; Or ; et al. | 2021-02-18 |
| Device for prevention of shunt stenosis Grant 10,898,623 - Shechtman , et al. January 26, 2 | 2021-01-26 |
| Device For Prevention Of Shunt Stenosis App 20170239401 - SHECHTMAN; Adi ; et al. | 2017-08-24 |
| Device for prevention of shunt stenosis Grant 9,675,748 - Shechtman , et al. June 13, 2 | 2017-06-13 |
| Device For Prevention Of Shunt Stenosis App 20140257165 - Shechtman; Adi ; et al. | 2014-09-11 |
| Device System And Method For Blunt Tissue Dissection App 20140094838 - Neuman; Menahem ; et al. | 2014-04-03 |
| SEC | 0001690103 | Gadot Harel |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 