Gabay; Gregory
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Gabay; Gregory.The latest application filed is for "exoskeleton device with expandable section for scoring".
- Gabay; Gregory - New Hope MN
- Gabay; Gregory - St. Louis Park MN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Stabilizing wires for medical device Grant 11,419,612 - Gabay , et al. August 23, 2 | 2022-08-23 |
| Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Delivery Device Incorporating Ablation Functionality App 20220079667 - Gabay; Gregory ; et al. | 2022-03-17 |
| Exoskeleton Device With Expandable Section For Scoring App 20220080164 - Fojtik; Shawn P. ; et al. | 2022-03-17 |
| Exoskeleton device with expandable section for scoring Grant 11,179,549 - Fojtik , et al. November 23, 2 | 2021-11-23 |
| Stabilizing Wires For Medical Device App 20210145448 - Gabay; Gregory ; et al. | 2021-05-20 |
| Elongated medical device with flexibility enhancing features Grant D894,384 - Gabay , et al. A | 2020-08-25 |
| Expandable exoskeleton for a balloon catheter Grant D855,800 - Gabay , et al. | 2019-08-06 |
| Exoskeleton Device With Expandable Section For Scoring App 20190126011 - Fojtik; Shawn P. ; et al. | 2019-05-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 