loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fukuyama Gomu Kogyo Kabushiki Gaisha.The latest application filed is for "core for rubber track and rubber track".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Core bar for rubber crawler Grant 8,465,109 - Kimura , et al. June 18, 2 | 2013-06-18 |
Core for rubber track and rubber track Grant 8,186,774 - Kato , et al. May 29, 2 | 2012-05-29 |
Core For Rubber Track And Rubber Track App 20100096916 - Kato; Yusaku ;   et al. | 2010-04-22 |
Rubber crawler track and method of producing metal core for rubber track Grant 7,413,268 - Kato , et al. August 19, 2 | 2008-08-19 |
Detachable crawler Grant 7,377,601 - Katoh , et al. May 27, 2 | 2008-05-27 |
Rubber crawler track Grant 7,293,844 - Uchiyama November 13, 2 | 2007-11-13 |
Rubber crawler and crawler traveling equipment Grant 7,201,457 - Katoh , et al. April 10, 2 | 2007-04-10 |
Connecting link type rubber crawler Grant 5,984,437 - Katoh November 16, 1 | 1999-11-16 |
Highly elastic rubber crawler Grant 5,593,218 - Katoh , et al. January 14, 1 | 1997-01-14 |
Rubber crawler Grant 5,522,655 - Katoh June 4, 1 | 1996-06-04 |
Combination linkage type rubber crawler Grant 5,362,142 - Katoh November 8, 1 | 1994-11-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.