loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fukasawa; Hiromichi.The latest application filed is for "method for manufacturing a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Method for manufacturing a hollow fiber membrane oxygenator Grant 5,037,610 - Fukasawa , et al. August 6, 1 | 1991-08-06 |
Method for manufacture of hollow fiber membrane type artificial lung Grant 4,971,836 - Fukasawa , et al. November 20, 1 | 1990-11-20 |
Hollow fiber membrane type oxygenator and method for manufacturing same Grant 4,923,679 - Fukasawa , et al. May 8, 1 | 1990-05-08 |
Hollow fiber membrane type artificial lung Grant 4,781,889 - Fukasawa , et al. November 1, 1 | 1988-11-01 |
Blood circulating circuit for membrane-type artificial lung, and reservoir for use in blood circulating circuit Grant 4,765,959 - Fukasawa August 23, 1 | 1988-08-23 |
Blood circulating circuit for membrane-type artificial lung, and reservoir for use in blood circulating circuit Grant 4,717,377 - Fukasawa January 5, 1 | 1988-01-05 |
Oxygenator Grant 4,374,802 - Fukasawa February 22, 1 | 1983-02-22 |
Oxygenator Grant 4,239,729 - Hasegawa , et al. December 16, 1 | 1980-12-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.