Froix; Michael
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Froix; Michael.The latest application filed is for "polymer compositions for intraluminal stent".
- Froix; Michael - Mountain View CA US
- Froix; Michael - Mountian View CA
- Froix; Michael - Los Altos CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Expandable unit cell and intraluminal stent Grant RE44,763 - Dinh , et al. February 11, 2 | 2014-02-11 |
| Polymer compositions for intraluminal stent Grant 7,374,570 - Alvarado , et al. May 20, 2 | 2008-05-20 |
| Polymer compositions for intraluminal stent App 20070073016 - Alvarado; Angelica ; et al. | 2007-03-29 |
| Polymer compositions for intraluminal stent Grant 7,115,691 - Alvarado , et al. October 3, 2 | 2006-10-03 |
| Compositions for induction of a therapeutic response App 20040191215 - Froix, Michael ; et al. | 2004-09-30 |
| Polymer compositions for intraluminal stent App 20040059408 - Alvarado, Angelica ; et al. | 2004-03-25 |
| Polymer compositions for intraluminal stent Grant 6,653,426 - Alvarado , et al. November 25, 2 | 2003-11-25 |
| Polymer compositions for intraluminal stent App 20030149470 - Alvarado, Angelica ; et al. | 2003-08-07 |
| Intraluminal stent having coaxial polymer member Grant 6,530,950 - Alvarado , et al. March 11, 2 | 2003-03-11 |
| Topoisomerase inhibitors for prevention of restenosis App 20020004679 - Eury, Robert ; et al. | 2002-01-10 |
| Expandable polymeric stent with memory and delivery apparatus and method Grant 6,248,129 - Froix June 19, 2 | 2001-06-19 |
| Bioerodible porous compositions Grant 6,238,705 - Liu , et al. May 29, 2 | 2001-05-29 |
| Intravascular stent having a coaxial polymer member and end sleeves Grant 6,168,619 - Dinh , et al. January 2, 2 | 2001-01-02 |
| Bioerodible porous compositions Grant 6,096,344 - Liu , et al. August 1, 2 | 2000-08-01 |
| Expandable unit cell and intraluminal stent Grant 6,019,789 - Dinh , et al. February 1, 2 | 2000-02-01 |
| Intravascular stent Grant 5,954,744 - Phan , et al. September 21, 1 | 1999-09-21 |
| Ionic beads useful for controlled release and adsorption Grant 5,871,722 - Nacht , et al. February 16, 1 | 1999-02-16 |
| Retinoid formulations in porous microspheres for reduced irritation and enhanced stability Grant 5,851,538 - Froix , et al. December 22, 1 | 1998-12-22 |
| Ionic beads for controlled release and adsorption Grant 5,840,293 - Nacht , et al. November 24, 1 | 1998-11-24 |
| Endoprosthetic device with therapeutic compound Grant 5,674,242 - Phan , et al. October 7, 1 | 1997-10-07 |
| Expandable polymeric stent with memory and delivery apparatus and method Grant 5,607,467 - Froix March 4, 1 | 1997-03-04 |
| Intravascular stent Grant 5,603,722 - Phan , et al. February 18, 1 | 1997-02-18 |
| Method of using expandable polymeric stent with memory Grant 5,258,020 - Froix November 2, 1 | 1993-11-02 |
| Expandable polymeric stent with memory and delivery apparatus and method Grant 5,163,952 - Froix November 17, 1 | 1992-11-17 |
| Clouding-resistant contact lens compositions Grant 4,871,785 - Froix October 3, 1 | 1989-10-03 |
| Clouding-resistant contact lens compositions Grant 4,752,627 - Froix June 21, 1 | 1988-06-21 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 