Freer Logic, Inc.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Freer Logic, Inc.. Freer Logic, Inc. has 3 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "BRAINAWARE"
- Company Aliases
- Freer Logic, Inc.
- Freer Logic, Inc. - Skyland NC US
| State Incorporated | NORTH CAROLINA |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 360 CANE CREEK RD FLETCHER, NORTH CAROLINA UNITED STATES 28732 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| DUAL EEG NON-CONTACT MONITOR WITH PERSONAL EEG MONITOR FOR CONCURRENT BRAIN MONITORING AND COMMUNICATION 20180008145 - 15/631426 FREER; Peter Anthony ; et al. | 2018-01-11 |
| NON-CONTACT BODY AND HEAD BASED MONITORING OF BRAIN ELECTRICAL ACTIVITY 20170311831 - 15/497734 FREER; Peter Anthony ; et al. | 2017-11-02 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"BRAINAWARE" 98117007 |
BRAINAWARE 2023-08-04 |
"CONSCIOUS CAR" 88408625 |
CONSCIOUS CAR 2019-04-30 |
"BODYWAVE" 3756221 78883466 |
BODYWAVE 2006-05-15 |
| NCAGE Code | 6Y0C4 | FREER LOGIC, INC. |
| CAGE Code | 6Y0C4 | FREER LOGIC, INC. |
| S.A.M. Registration | 6Y0C4 [624310038] | FREER LOGIC, INC. |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 