Flowmedic L T D

USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings

Trademark applications and grants for Flowmedic L T D. Flowmedic L T D has 6 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "HOMEFIT"

Company Profile

Flowmedic Limited
FLOWMEDIC LIMITED - Hamilton BM
FLOWMEDIC LIMITED - Claredon House, 2 Church Street Hamilton BM
Flowmedic Limited -

Trademarks Patents

Patent Applications

Patent Application	Date
Sleeves for Accommodating a Circulation Enhancement Device 20080255494 - 11/569808 Rousso; Benny ; et al.	2008-10-16
Method and system for external counterpulsation 20070173886 - 10/597613 Rousso; Benny ; et al.	2007-07-26
Supportive structure and circulation enhancing apparatus 20070055188 - 11/442647 Avni; Yuval ; et al.	2007-03-08

Patent Grants & Applications

Trademark Applications

Mark Image Registration \| Serial	Trademark Application Date
"HOMEFIT" 78727757	HOMEFIT 2005-10-06
"AVIAFIT" 3541834 78639714	AVIAFIT 2005-05-30
"TRAVEL COMPANION" 78422501	TRAVEL COMPANION 2004-05-20
"ELASTIC RECOIL" 78422507	ELASTIC RECOIL 2004-05-20
"FLOWMEDIC" 3077601 78413099	FLOWMEDIC 2004-05-04
"FLOWMEDIC" 3077407 78298177	FLOWMEDIC 2003-09-09

uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.

While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.

All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.