Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited.The latest application filed is for "bi-directional torque transmission unit".
- Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited - Horbury Wakefield GB2
- Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited - GB2 GB2
- Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited - GB GB
- Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited - N/A
- Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited - Yorkshire EN
- Fletcher Sutcliffe Wild Limited - Horbury Wakefield EN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Bi-directional torque transmission unit Grant 4,805,473 - Bower February 21, 1 | 1989-02-21 |
| Transmission coupling including a clutch-brake combination Grant 4,456,109 - Bottomley , et al. June 26, 1 | 1984-06-26 |
| Hydraulic pump with piston sealing Grant 4,352,499 - Foster October 5, 1 | 1982-10-05 |
| Mining equipment Grant 4,102,139 - Wake July 25, 1 | 1978-07-25 |
| Mining Equipment Grant 3,854,295 - Round December 17, 1 | 1974-12-17 |
| Rotary Coal Cutters With Water Jet Orifices Grant 3,847,439 - Allen November 12, 1 | 1974-11-12 |
| Drum Type Rotary Coal Cutter With Water Jet Orifices Grant 3,827,755 - Allen August 6, 1 | 1974-08-06 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 