loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fishlock; Daniel.The latest application filed is for "asymmetric synthesis of a substituted pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Asymmetric synthesis of a substituted pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide Grant 9,828,340 - Fishlock , et al. November 28, 2 | 2017-11-28 |
(3,4-dichloro-phenyl)-((S)-3-propyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-methanone hydrochloride and manufacturing processes Grant 9,527,810 - Adam , et al. December 27, 2 | 2016-12-27 |
Asymmetric Synthesis Of A Substituted Pyrrolidine-2-carboxamide App 20160002158 - FISHLOCK; Daniel ;   et al. | 2016-01-07 |
Substituted pyrrolidine-2-carboxamides Grant 8,993,614 - Bartkovitz , et al. March 31, 2 | 2015-03-31 |
(3,4-dichloro-phenyl)-((s)-3-propyl-pyrrolidin-3-yl)-methanone Hydrochloride And Manufacturing Processes App 20150045408 - Adam; Jean-Michel ;   et al. | 2015-02-12 |
Substituted Pyrrolidine-2-carboxamides App 20130244958 - Bartkovitz; David Joseph ;   et al. | 2013-09-19 |
Inhibitors of Bruton's tyrosine kinase Grant 8,299,077 - Berthel , et al. October 30, 2 | 2012-10-30 |
Inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase App 20100222325 - Berthel; Steven ;   et al. | 2010-09-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.