Fingerle; Dieter
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fingerle; Dieter.The latest application filed is for "tubular ceramic body for gas passages in cylinder head of internal combustion engine".
- Fingerle; Dieter - Hochdorf DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Tubular ceramic body for gas passages in cylinder head of internal combustion engine Grant 4,840,154 - Fingerle , et al. June 20, 1 | 1989-06-20 |
| Operating element for operating the valves of an internal combustion engine Grant 4,643,144 - Fingerle , et al. February 17, 1 | 1987-02-17 |
| Piston with a member made of partially stabilized zirconium oxide Grant 4,535,683 - Dworak , et al. August 20, 1 | 1985-08-20 |
| Thermal insulation lining of ceramic material for a hot gas duct enveloped in metal Grant 4,526,824 - Dworak , et al. July 2, 1 | 1985-07-02 |
| Piston ring for an internal combustion engine Grant 4,522,415 - Dworak , et al. June 11, 1 | 1985-06-11 |
| Pre-combustion or turbulence chamber for internal combustion engines Grant 4,522,171 - Dworak , et al. June 11, 1 | 1985-06-11 |
| Machine component of oxide ceramic material Grant 4,420,142 - Dworak , et al. December 13, 1 | 1983-12-13 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 