Fih Co L T D
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Fih Co L T D. Fih Co L T D has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ROVOX"
- Company Aliases
- FIH Co., Ltd.
- FIH CO.,LTD - Shindian City TW
- FIH CO.,LTD. - 15F, No.207-1, Sec.3, Peishin Road Shindian TW
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| Chip card retaining mechanism 20070128914 - 11/484395 Yang; Qing ; et al. | 2007-06-07 |
| CHIP CARD RETAINING MECHANISM 20070125855 - 11/309512 Jiang; Mao-Fa ; et al. | 2007-06-07 |
| BATTERY COVER MECHANISM 20070122693 - 11/309362 Qin; Zhong-Shu ; et al. | 2007-05-31 |
| EMI/RFI shield for electronic device 20070121307 - 11/478412 Yang; Qing ; et al. | 2007-05-31 |
| BATTERY COVER LATCHING ASSEMBLY FOR PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE 20070111086 - 11/309434 Li; Yong ; et al. | 2007-05-17 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"ROVOX" 98278164 |
ROVOX 2023-11-20 |
"FIH ROBOTICS" 98076042 |
FIH ROBOTICS 2023-07-07 |
"Symbol/Image" 4625877 86013450 |
Symbol/Image 2013-07-18 |
"FID" 3331469 78710006 |
FID 2005-09-09 |
"FIH" 3181715 78533405 |
FIH 2004-12-16 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 