Field; Robert E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Field; Robert E..The latest application filed is for "aerodynamically controlled ejector".
- Field; Robert E. - Sycamore IL
- Field; Robert E. - Tequesta FL
- Field; Robert E. - West Lafayette IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Aerodynamically controlled ejector Grant 5,799,874 - Eigenbrode , et al. September 1, 1 | 1998-09-01 |
| Fluid cooled hot duct liner structure Grant 5,144,795 - Field September 8, 1 | 1992-09-08 |
| Hot gas duct liner Grant 4,887,663 - Auxier , et al. December 19, 1 | 1989-12-19 |
| Film cooling passages with step diffuser Grant 4,738,588 - Field April 19, 1 | 1988-04-19 |
| Film cooling slot with metered flow Grant 4,726,735 - Field , et al. February 23, 1 | 1988-02-23 |
| Film cooling passages with curved corners Grant 4,684,323 - Field August 4, 1 | 1987-08-04 |
| Film coolant passages for cast hollow airfoils Grant 4,676,719 - Auxier , et al. June 30, 1 | 1987-06-30 |
| Method of fabricating film cooling slot in a hollow airfoil Grant 4,672,727 - Field June 16, 1 | 1987-06-16 |
| Film coolant passage with swirl diffuser Grant 4,669,957 - Phillips , et al. June 2, 1 | 1987-06-02 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 