Fertner; Rembert
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fertner; Rembert.The latest application filed is for "optical treatment system and an adjustment member therefor".
- Fertner; Rembert - Klagenfurt AT
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Electromagnetic radiation delivery apparatus Grant 9,220,564 - Fertner , et al. December 29, 2 | 2015-12-29 |
| Optical Treatment System And An Adjustment Member Therefor App 20100324544 - Fertner; Rembert ; et al. | 2010-12-23 |
| Electromagnetic Radiation Delivery Apparatus App 20100276609 - Fertner; Rembert ; et al. | 2010-11-04 |
| Skin-Treatment Device App 20080195182 - Fertner; Rembert | 2008-08-14 |
| Refill and storage holder for personal care appliance Grant 7,264,026 - Gruber , et al. September 4, 2 | 2007-09-04 |
| Personal care apparatus with a suction pipette App 20060116650 - Fertner; Rembert ; et al. | 2006-06-01 |
| Personal care system with a personal care device and a cooling device App 20050080432 - Fertner, Rembert ; et al. | 2005-04-14 |
| Refill and storage holder for personal care appliance App 20030037447 - Gruber, Paul ; et al. | 2003-02-27 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 