loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez; Jesus.The latest application filed is for "latch assembly for wet/dry vacuum cleaner".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Latch assembly for wet/dry vacuum cleaner Grant 7,841,043 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez , et al. November 30 | 2010-11-30 |
Latch assembly for wet/dry vacuum cleaner App 20070261182 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez; Jesus ;   et al. | 2007-11-15 |
Motor mounting base App 20050134140 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez, Jesus | 2005-06-23 |
Vacuum cleaner cooling system Grant 6,807,709 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez October 26, 2 | 2004-10-26 |
Vacuum cleaner locking system Grant 6,807,706 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez October 26, 2 | 2004-10-26 |
Motor mounting base App 20030151322 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez, Jesus | 2003-08-14 |
Hose attachment device App 20030145415 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez, Jesus | 2003-08-07 |
Vacuum cleaner cooling system App 20030145426 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez, Jesus | 2003-08-07 |
Multi-function vacuum cleaner accessory App 20030145425 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez, Jesus | 2003-08-07 |
Vacuum cleaner locking system App 20030145416 - Fernandez-Grandizo Martinez, Jesus | 2003-08-07 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.