Fennemann; Wolfgang
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fennemann; Wolfgang.The latest application filed is for "process for producing catalysts and impregnating solutions and catalysts produced by the process".
- Fennemann; Wolfgang - Karben DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Process for producing catalysts and impregnating solutions and catalysts produced by the process Grant 5,116,798 - Fennemann May 26, 1 | 1992-05-26 |
| Process of catalytically reducing NO Grant 4,950,139 - Fennemann , et al. August 21, 1 | 1990-08-21 |
| Process for the simultaneous removal of nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide from an oxygen-containing exhaust gas Grant 4,851,202 - Fennemann July 25, 1 | 1989-07-25 |
| Process of removing pollutants from exhaust gases Grant 4,548,797 - Sauer , et al. October 22, 1 | 1985-10-22 |
| Process of recovering anhydrous zirconium tetrafluoride Grant 4,399,118 - Fennemann August 16, 1 | 1983-08-16 |
| Process for regenerating spent pickle liquid containing ZrF.sub.4 Grant 4,330,342 - Fennemann , et al. May 18, 1 | 1982-05-18 |
| Method of incinerating salt-containing liquid sludge Grant 3,921,543 - Menigat , et al. November 25, 1 | 1975-11-25 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 