loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Faust; Scott.The latest application filed is for "element sub-structure".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Two-piece fuse endbell with pre-cast/pre-molded alignment slots and optional interface crush ribs Grant 11,289,297 - Burns , et al. March 29, 2 | 2022-03-29 |
Element Sub-structure App 20210304998 - Faust; Scott | 2021-09-30 |
Element sub-structure Grant 11,114,266 - Faust September 7, 2 | 2021-09-07 |
Buccal tube Grant D754,352 - Faust , et al. April 19, 2 | 2016-04-19 |
Buccal tube Grant D739,536 - Faust , et al. September 22, 2 | 2015-09-22 |
Buccal tube Grant D720,856 - Faust , et al. January 6, 2 | 2015-01-06 |
Soil shaping agricultural implement Grant 8,016,044 - Kromminga , et al. September 13, 2 | 2011-09-13 |
Soil Shaping Agricultural Implement App 20110100653 - Kromminga; Gaylen J. ;   et al. | 2011-05-05 |
Rigid standard bearing shield disk scraper system Grant 7,631,701 - Kromminga , et al. December 15, 2 | 2009-12-15 |
Adjustable Scraper Blade System For Disk Harrows App 20090000796 - Cooper; Troy L. ;   et al. | 2009-01-01 |
Rigid Standard Bearing Shield Disk Scraper System App 20080264657 - Kromminga; Gaylen J. ;   et al. | 2008-10-30 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.