loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Fang; Xiaolin.The latest application filed is for "atomizer and electronic cigarette using the same".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Oral irrigator Grant D948,033 - Fang April 5, 2 | 2022-04-05 |
Oral irrigator Grant D948,032 - Fang April 5, 2 | 2022-04-05 |
Atomizer And Electronic Cigarette Using The Same App 20220016367 - FANG; XIAOLIN | 2022-01-20 |
Atomizer and electronic cigarette using the same Grant 11,123,503 - Fang September 21, 2 | 2021-09-21 |
Oral irrigator Grant D888,935 - Fang | 2020-06-30 |
Atomizer And Electronic Cigarette Using The Same App 20190282770 - FANG; XIAOLIN | 2019-09-19 |
Atomizer and electronic cigarette using the same Grant 10,357,623 - Fang July 23, 2 | 2019-07-23 |
Multifunctional smart toothbrush Grant D846,882 - Fang | 2019-04-30 |
Atomizer And Electronic Cigarette Using The Same App 20160353803 - FANG; XIAOLIN | 2016-12-08 |
Atomizer And Electronic Cigarette Using The Same App 20150305405 - FANG; XIAOLIN | 2015-10-29 |
Atomizer and electronic cigarette using the same Grant 9,022,026 - Fang May 5, 2 | 2015-05-05 |
Atomizer And Electronic Cigarette Using The Same App 20110011396 - FANG; XIAOLIN | 2011-01-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.