Trademark applications and grants for Evogen Inc.. Evogen Inc. has 61 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "KTA"
State Incorporated | CALIFORNIA |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | 271 E. Hacienda Ave. Campbell, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 95008 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SEIZURES AND EPILEPSY 20220178948 - 16/613968 WALLACH; Todd ;   et al. | 2022-06-09 |
BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR EVALUATION AND TREATMENT OF EPILEPTIC VS NON-EPILEPTIC SEIZURES / NO SEIZURES / PSYCHOGENIC NON-EPILEPTIC SEIZURES 20210199672 - 17/058502 WALLACH; Todd ;   et al. | 2021-07-01 |
BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SEIZURES AND EPILEPSY 20200300871 - 16/893266 WALLACH; Todd ;   et al. | 2020-09-24 |
BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SEIZURES AND EPILEPSY 20200299377 - 16/685149 WALLACH; Todd ;   et al. | 2020-09-24 |
BIOMARKERS AND METHODS FOR DETECTION OF SEIZURES AND EPILEPSY 20190011461 - 16/067983 WALLACH; Todd ;   et al. | 2019-01-10 |
NCAGE Code | 3B9L9 | EVOGEN INC. |
CAGE Code | 3B9L9 | EVOGEN INC. |
S.A.M. Registration | 3B9L9 [111782285] | EVOGEN INC. |
DUNS | 111782285 | Evogen Inc. |
SEC | 0001170875 | Evogen, Inc. of DELAWARE |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.