Evans Tim
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Evans Tim. Evans Tim has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CHAOS METABOLIC TRAINING"
- Company Aliases
- Evans, Tim
- tim evans
- Evans; Tim - Cambridge GB
- Evans, Tim - Cambridge GB
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| DRY POWDER INHALER WITH REPRODUCIBLE FLOW RESISTANCE 20180043111 - 15/676217 Ahern; David ; et al. | 2018-02-15 |
| Flush mount speaker mounting apparatus 20040047487 - 10/238824 Popken, Ian ; et al. | 2004-03-11 |
| Dry powder inhaler with reproducible flow resistance 11,020,549 - 15/676,217 Ahern , et al. June 1, 2 | 2021-06-01 |
| Dry powder inhaler D836,190 - D/570,381 Evans , et al. Dec | 2018-12-18 |
| Dry powder inhaler D834,702 - D/570,382 Evans , et al. Nov | 2018-11-27 |
| Inhaler D793,546 - D/559,394 Ahern , et al. August 1, 2 | 2017-08-01 |
| Flush mount speaker mounting apparatus 6,925,190 - 10/238,824 Popken , et al. August 2, 2 | 2005-08-02 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"CHAOS METABOLIC TRAINING" 86636436 |
CHAOS METABOLIC TRAINING 2015-05-20 |
"INNATE FITNESS" 86636443 |
INNATE FITNESS 2015-05-20 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 