Trademark applications and grants for Etopus Technology Inc. Etopus Technology Inc has 5 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "CHIPLIPHY"
State Incorporated | CALIFORNIA |
Entity Type | CORPORATION |
Address | Suite 110, 2870 Zanker Road san jose, CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES 95134 |
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
ADC SLICER RECONFIGURATION FOR DIFFERENT CHANNEL INSERTION LOSS 20220140837 - 17/397303 Xu; Danfeng | 2022-05-05 |
ADC RECONFIGURATION FOR DIFFERENT DATA RATES 20210143830 - 17/150644 Xu; Danfeng | 2021-05-13 |
ADC RECONFIGURATION FOR DIFFERENT DATA RATES 20210028791 - 16/902919 Xu; Danfeng | 2021-01-28 |
RECEIVER FOR HIGH SPEED COMMUNICATION CHANNEL 20200259684 - A1 | 2020-08-13 |
RECEIVER FOR HIGH SPEED COMMUNICATION CHANNEL 20190207787 - 16/293428 Chan; Kai Keung ;   et al. | 2019-07-04 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "CHIPLIPHY" 97606009 |
CHIPLIPHY 2022-09-25 |
![]() "EZLINK" 5570493 87807491 |
EZLINK 2018-02-22 |
![]() "EZEYE" 5570501 87807572 |
EZEYE 2018-02-22 |
![]() "EPRT" 5570009 87799846 |
EPRT 2018-02-15 |
![]() "EPHY" 5282464 87081686 |
EPHY 2016-06-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.