loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Etes; Donald E..The latest application filed is for "disposable devices for testing body fluids".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Disposable devices for testing body fluids Grant 6,709,633 - Etes , et al. March 23, 2 | 2004-03-23 |
Disposable Devices For Testing Body Fluids App 20030138351 - ETES, DONALD E. ;   et al. | 2003-07-24 |
Disposable emesis container Grant 4,182,478 - Etes January 8, 1 | 1980-01-08 |
Plastic composition manufacture thereof, and pad formed therewith Grant 4,153,055 - Etes May 8, 1 | 1979-05-08 |
Plastic composition and method Grant 4,078,568 - Etes , et al. March 14, 1 | 1978-03-14 |
Ostomy appliance Grant 4,054,140 - Etes October 18, 1 | 1977-10-18 |
Check valve Grant 3,990,472 - Etes November 9, 1 | 1976-11-09 |
Disposable Bags Grant 3,797,734 - Fleury , et al. March 19, 1 | 1974-03-19 |
Operating Boards Grant 3,779,211 - Etes December 18, 1 | 1973-12-18 |
Post-surgical Drainage Collection Pouch Grant 3,759,260 - Nolan , et al. September 18, 1 | 1973-09-18 |
Fishing Tools Grant 3,694,014 - Rossbach , et al. September 26, 1 | 1972-09-26 |
Composition Containing Gel Grant 3,640,741 - Etes February 8, 1 | 1972-02-08 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.