loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Esteban; Daniel J..The latest application filed is for "branch control in a three phase pipelined signal processor".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Branch control in a three phase pipelined signal processor Grant 5,081,574 - Larsen , et al. January 14, 1 | 1992-01-14 |
Three phased pipelined signal processor Grant 4,794,517 - Jones , et al. December 27, 1 | 1988-12-27 |
Speech coding method and device for implementing the improved method Grant 4,464,783 - Beraud , et al. August 7, 1 | 1984-08-07 |
Method and apparatus for efficient statistical multiplexing of voice and data signals Grant 4,455,649 - Esteban , et al. June 19, 1 | 1984-06-19 |
Process for compressing data relative to voice signals and device applying said process Grant 4,216,354 - Esteban , et al. August 5, 1 | 1980-08-05 |
Process for block quantizing an electrical signal and device for implementing said process Grant 4,051,470 - Esteban , et al. September 27, 1 | 1977-09-27 |
Digital Filter For Pcm Encoded Signals Grant 3,777,130 - Croisier , et al. December 4, 1 | 1973-12-04 |
Unconditionally Stable, Open Loop Operational Amplifier Grant 3,569,848 - Esteban March 9, 1 | 1971-03-09 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.