Ericsson; Daniel
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ericsson; Daniel.The latest application filed is for "apparatus and system for securing a cutting device".
- Ericsson; Daniel - Olofstorp SE
- Ericsson; Daniel - Stockholm N/A SE
- Ericsson; Daniel - Huddinge N/A SE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Apparatus and system for securing a cutting device Grant 11,162,228 - Ericsson November 2, 2 | 2021-11-02 |
| Apparatus And System For Securing A Cutting Device App 20160108583 - Ericsson; Daniel | 2016-04-21 |
| Onion peeling device Grant 9,060,637 - Knezevic , et al. June 23, 2 | 2015-06-23 |
| Vegetable and fruit slicer and method for slicing Grant 8,739,669 - Engdahl , et al. June 3, 2 | 2014-06-03 |
| Garlic press Grant 8,534,190 - Ericsson , et al. September 17, 2 | 2013-09-17 |
| Onion Peeling Device App 20120318151 - Knezevic; Nikola ; et al. | 2012-12-20 |
| Onion peeler Grant D668,121 - Knezevic , et al. October 2, 2 | 2012-10-02 |
| Garlic Press App 20100236429 - Ericsson; Daniel ; et al. | 2010-09-23 |
| Vegetable And Fruit Slicer And Method For Slicing App 20100031830 - Engdahl; Benny ; et al. | 2010-02-11 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 