EOFlow Co., Ltd.
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for Eoflow Co., Ltd.. Eoflow Co., Ltd. has 10 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "EOFLOW"
- Company Aliases
- EOFlow Co., Ltd.
- EOFLOW CO., LTD. - Seongnam-si Gyeonggi-do KR
- EOFLOW CO., LTD. - Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do KR
- EOFLOW CO., LTD. - Seongnam-si KR
| State Incorporated | KOREA, REPUBLIC OF |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | H2202, 172, Dolma-ro, Bundang-gu, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do KOREA, REPUBLIC OF 13605 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| LIQUID MEDICINE INJECTION DEVICE 20220288301 - 17/652627 Kim; Jesse Jaejin ; et al. | 2022-09-15 |
| USER TERMINAL AND METHOD FOR MANAGING STATUS THROUGH USER TERMINAL AFTER AUTOMATICALLY INJECTING MEDICATION 20220230756 - 17/596328 KIM; Jesse J. ; et al. | 2022-07-21 |
| ELECTROOSMOTIC PUMP 20220170447 - 17/652139 Kim; Seung Ha ; et al. | 2022-06-02 |
| NEEDLE ASSEMBLY AND DRUG INJECTION DEVICE COMPRISING SAME 20210316066 - 17/268417 KIM; Jesse Jae Jin ; et al. | 2021-10-14 |
| ELECTROOSMOTIC PUMP AND FLUID-PUMPING SYSTEM COMPRISING THE SAME 20210239102 - 17/235730 Kim; Jesse Jaejin ; et al. | 2021-08-05 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 