Enomoto; Satoru
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Enomoto; Satoru.The latest application filed is for "antiinflammatory gel preparation".
- Enomoto; Satoru - Narita JP
- Enomoto; Satoru - Fujisawa JP
- Enomoto; Satoru - Tokyo JP
- Enomoto; Satoru - N/A JA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Antiinflammatory gel preparation Grant 5,350,769 - Kasai , et al. September 27, 1 | 1994-09-27 |
| Chlorambucil derivatives Grant 4,332,797 - Asano , et al. June 1, 1 | 1982-06-01 |
| Methylated prostaglandin derivatives Grant 4,318,908 - Enomoto , et al. * March 9, 1 | 1982-03-09 |
| Process for the preparation of Chlorambucil derivatives Grant 4,261,910 - Asano , et al. April 14, 1 | 1981-04-14 |
| Prostaglandine derivatives Grant 4,198,405 - Enomoto , et al. April 15, 1 | 1980-04-15 |
| Aqueous coating composition Grant 4,130,526 - Nakayama , et al. December 19, 1 | 1978-12-19 |
| Air drying reaction product of a diisocyanate and 1-methyl-2-vinyl-4,6-heptadienol Grant 4,069,211 - Nishita , et al. January 17, 1 | 1978-01-17 |
| Water resisting and anticorrosive painting method and the painted articles Grant 3,864,153 - Enomoto February 4, 1 | 1975-02-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 