Endo Technic Corporation
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Endo Technic Corporation.The latest application filed is for "destroying bacteria on physiologic tissue".
- Endo Technic Corporation - San Clemente CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Destroying bacteria on physiologic tissue Grant 5,622,501 - Levy April 22, 1 | 1997-04-22 |
| Vaporizing tartar and calculus around a tooth root Grant 5,188,532 - Levy February 23, 1 | 1993-02-23 |
| Removing a post embedded in a tooth Grant 5,173,049 - Levy December 22, 1 | 1992-12-22 |
| Method for filling an opening in tooth or bone material using laser radiation Grant 5,171,150 - Levy December 15, 1 | 1992-12-15 |
| Optical fiber for use with dental laser Grant 5,169,318 - Levy December 8, 1 | 1992-12-08 |
| Removing physiologic tissue from a tooth canal Grant 5,151,029 - Levy September 29, 1 | 1992-09-29 |
| Cutting mineralized physiologic tissue using laser radiation Grant 5,118,293 - Levy June 2, 1 | 1992-06-02 |
| Process for cleaning and enlarging passages Grant 5,116,227 - Levy May 26, 1 | 1992-05-26 |
| Method and apparatus for filling a tooth canal Grant 5,092,773 - Levy March 3, 1 | 1992-03-03 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 