Emitec Gesellschaft fur Emissionstechnologies mbH
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Emitec Gesellschaft fur Emissionstechnologies mbH.The latest application filed is for "honeycomb body with an at least partially ceramic honeycomb structure and a receptacle for a measurement sensor, and process for producing such a honeycomb body".
- Emitec Gesellschaft fur Emissionstechnologies mbH -
- Emitec Gesellschaft fur Emissionstechnologies mbH - Lohmar DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Honeycomb body with an at least partially ceramic honeycomb structure and a receptacle for a measurement sensor, and process for producing such a honeycomb body App 20070266686 - Bruck; Rolf | 2007-11-22 |
| Small-volume NO.sub.x adsorber Grant 7,179,767 - Bruck February 20, 2 | 2007-02-20 |
| Device for reducing a level of nitrogen oxides in an exhaust gas of an internal combustion engine Grant 6,516,610 - Hodgson February 11, 2 | 2003-02-11 |
| Double-walled housing, in particular for exhaust gas catalytic converters of motor vehicles and method of producing a double-walled housing Grant 6,334,981 - Wieres January 1, 2 | 2002-01-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 