Ellement; Nathan John
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Ellement; Nathan John.The latest application filed is for "retrieval trailer".
- Ellement; Nathan John - Oakford AU
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Retrieval trailer Grant 9,789,803 - Ellement October 17, 2 | 2017-10-17 |
| Retrieval Trailer App 20160362037 - Ellement; Nathan John | 2016-12-15 |
| Vehicle Access System App 20160108672 - Ellement; Nathan John | 2016-04-21 |
| Vehicle access system Grant 9,238,941 - Ellement January 19, 2 | 2016-01-19 |
| Access device Grant 9,145,091 - Ellement September 29, 2 | 2015-09-29 |
| Access system and device for vehicles, and modes of employment thereof Grant 8,668,216 - Ellement March 11, 2 | 2014-03-11 |
| Access System and Device for Earthmoving Vehicles, and Modes of Employment Thereof App 20130193667 - Ellement; Nathan John | 2013-08-01 |
| Access System and Device for Vehicles, and Modes of Employment Thereof App 20110140389 - Ellement; Nathan John | 2011-06-16 |
| Access Device App 20090065301 - Ellement; Nathan John | 2009-03-12 |
| Vehicle Access System App 20090038885 - Ellement; Nathan John | 2009-02-12 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 