Elist; James J.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Elist; James J..The latest application filed is for "testicular implant device and method".
- Elist; James J. - Beverly Hills CA
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Testicular Implant Device and Method App 20220249233 - Elist; James J. | 2022-08-11 |
| Penile Implant Device and Method App 20210361432 - Elist; James J. | 2021-11-25 |
| Penile Implant Device and Method App 20210361433 - Elist; James J. | 2021-11-25 |
| Prosthesis for improved penis function Grant 9,504,573 - Elist November 29, 2 | 2016-11-29 |
| Vertical drain retainer Grant D700,963 - Elist , et al. March 11, 2 | 2014-03-11 |
| Transurethral Ultrasonic Imaging System App 20100137721 - Rose; Harold B. ; et al. | 2010-06-03 |
| Introducer App 20070038097 - Crawford; Alan D. ; et al. | 2007-02-15 |
| Transurethral ultrasonic imaging system App 20060247529 - Rose; Harold B. ; et al. | 2006-11-02 |
| Penile implant for improved appearance Grant 5,669,870 - Elist September 23, 1 | 1997-09-23 |
| Implant for expanding penile girth and length Grant 5,445,594 - Elist August 29, 1 | 1995-08-29 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 