loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Egelhof; Dieter.The latest application filed is for "process for forming a multi-ply fiber web".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Process for forming a multi-ply fiber web Grant 6,702,926 - Egelhof , et al. March 9, 2 | 2004-03-09 |
Wire section, belt guidance device, and process for forming fibrous material web in wire section Grant 6,342,126 - Grabscheid , et al. January 29, 2 | 2002-01-29 |
Wire part for forming a multi-ply fiber web Grant 6,159,341 - Egelhof , et al. December 12, 2 | 2000-12-12 |
Method and device for quality improvement in multilayer and multiply papers Grant 5,639,349 - Begemann , et al. June 17, 1 | 1997-06-17 |
Twin-wire former Grant 5,507,918 - Polifke , et al. April 16, 1 | 1996-04-16 |
Twin wire former Grant 5,389,206 - Buck , et al. February 14, 1 | 1995-02-14 |
Stock-inlet for papermaking machine Grant 5,304,285 - Meinecke , et al. April 19, 1 | 1994-04-19 |
Double screen former with flexible laths spaced greater than opposite rigid laths Grant 5,045,153 - Sollinger , et al. September 3, 1 | 1991-09-03 |
Feeding device for paper machines Grant 3,954,558 - Egelhof May 4, 1 | 1976-05-04 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.