Edwards; William F.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Edwards; William F..The latest application filed is for "integrated connector module for automation optimization".
- Edwards; William F. - Livermore CA
- Edwards; William F. - Phoenix AZ
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Integrated connector module for automation optimization Grant 10,522,280 - Edwards , et al. Dec | 2019-12-31 |
| Integrated Connector Module For Automation Optimization App 20170125149 - Edwards; William F. ; et al. | 2017-05-04 |
| Common mode choke and integrated connector module automation optimization Grant 9,576,716 - Edwards , et al. February 21, 2 | 2017-02-21 |
| Common Mode Choke And Integrated Connector Module Automation Optimization App 20150179328 - Edwards; William F. ; et al. | 2015-06-25 |
| AC/DC power accommodation method and apparatus for networking/telecommunications devices Grant 6,347,949 - Edwards , et al. February 19, 2 | 2002-02-19 |
| Closely-positioned multiple GBIC connectors Grant 6,272,019 - Edwards , et al. August 7, 2 | 2001-08-07 |
| Roll Gate Latch Grant 3,698,752 - Edwards October 17, 1 | 1972-10-17 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 