Edwards; Robert Douglas
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Edwards; Robert Douglas.The latest application filed is for "structure having embedded flush circuitry features and method of fabricating".
- Edwards; Robert Douglas - Binghamton NY
- Edwards; Robert Douglas - Endicott NY
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Structure having embedded flush circuitry features and method of fabricating Grant 6,841,228 - Edwards , et al. January 11, 2 | 2005-01-11 |
| Structure having embedded flush circuitry features and method of fabricating App 20040081810 - Edwards, Robert Douglas ; et al. | 2004-04-29 |
| Structure having embedded flush circuitry features and method of fabricating Grant 6,663,786 - Edwards , et al. December 16, 2 | 2003-12-16 |
| Structure having embedded flush circuitry features and method of fabricating App 20020192439 - Edwards, Robert Douglas ; et al. | 2002-12-19 |
| Method and apparatus for in-situ testing of integrated circuit chips Grant 6,414,509 - Bhatt , et al. July 2, 2 | 2002-07-02 |
| Electrolytic method of depositing gold connectors on a printed circuit board Grant 5,733,466 - Benebo , et al. March 31, 1 | 1998-03-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 