Trademark applications and grants for Edwards Alexander. Edwards Alexander has 4 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "LK"
Patent Application | Date |
---|---|
Formulations of Viable Cells for Oral Delivery 20120027811 - 13/143829 Edwards; Alexander ;   et al. | 2012-02-02 |
Camera-controlled self-delivery cart 11,224,967 - 16/283,273 Lin , et al. January 18, 2 | 2022-01-18 |
Customer and merchant location-based ETA determination 10,921,147 - 16/116,693 Hapgood , et al. February 16, 2 | 2021-02-16 |
ETA-based item pick-up and fulfillment alternatives 10,769,712 - 16/036,586 Edwards , et al. Sep | 2020-09-08 |
Sensor-based customer arrival detection 10,762,462 - 16/057,430 Hapgood , et al. Sep | 2020-09-01 |
Automatic camera configuration using a fiducial marker 10,453,216 - 15/459,583 Zelenskiy , et al. Oc | 2019-10-22 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
---|---|
![]() "LK" 90619701 |
LK 2021-04-01 |
![]() "LK" 88377622 |
LK 2019-04-09 |
![]() "ARMO'S" 88232879 |
ARMO'S 2018-12-18 |
![]() "DEFILY" 74293726 |
DEFILY 1992-07-10 |
NCAGE Code | 65ZF0 | ALEXANDER & EDWARDS |
CAGE Code | 65ZF0 | ALEXANDER & EDWARDS |
DUNS | 014522600 | ALEXANDER & EDWARDS |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.