loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Eder; Ulrich.The latest application filed is for ".beta.-carbolin-3-carboxylic acid derivatives useful for treating anxiety and related disorders".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
.beta.-carbolin-3-carboxylic acid derivatives useful for treating anxiety and related disorders Grant 5,010,077 - Braestrup , et al. April 23, 1 | 1991-04-23 |
Pharmacologically active 3-substituted beta-carbolines useful as tranquilizers Grant 4,596,808 - Braestrup , et al. June 24, 1 | 1986-06-24 |
Pharmacologically active 3-substituted beta-carbolines Grant 4,435,403 - Braestrup , et al. March 6, 1 | 1984-03-06 |
(Erolinyl)-N,N-diethylurea derivatives, and their preparation and use Grant 4,379,790 - Horowski , et al. April 12, 1 | 1983-04-12 |
.beta.-Carbolin-3-carboxylic acid derivatives Grant 4,371,536 - Braestrup , et al. February 1, 1 | 1983-02-01 |
Process for the preparation of 4-androstene-3,17-dione derivatives Grant 4,100,027 - Weber , et al. July 11, 1 | 1978-07-11 |
Bicycloalkane derivatives Grant 4,072,716 - Sauer , et al. February 7, 1 | 1978-02-07 |
Process for the preparation of 17.beta.-oxalyl steroids Grant 3,960,842 - Haffer , et al. June 1, 1 | 1976-06-01 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.