Eche; Christophe
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Eche; Christophe.The latest application filed is for "axle for rail vehicle having a low-level floor, bogie and corresponding rail vehicle".
- Eche; Christophe - Montchanin N/A FR
- Eche; Christophe - Monchanin N/A FR
- Eche; Christophe - Le Creusot FR
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Motor-driven bogie for a streetcar Grant 8,978,563 - Rodet , et al. March 17, 2 | 2015-03-17 |
| Railway vehicle comprising pivoting bogies Grant 8,381,659 - Rodet , et al. February 26, 2 | 2013-02-26 |
| Bogie for railway vehicle Grant 8,371,234 - Rodet , et al. February 12, 2 | 2013-02-12 |
| Railway vehicle comprising pivoting end bogies Grant 8,365,675 - Rodet , et al. February 5, 2 | 2013-02-05 |
| Axle for rail vehicle having a low-level floor, bogie and corresponding rail vehicle App 20070186803 - Rodet; Alain ; et al. | 2007-08-16 |
| Motor bogie for a vehicle having an integral low-slung floor Grant 6,601,520 - Eche , et al. August 5, 2 | 2003-08-05 |
| Motor bogie for a vehicle having an integral low-slung floor App 20020195018 - Eche, Christophe ; et al. | 2002-12-26 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 