Eberspacher; Uwe
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Eberspacher; Uwe.The latest application filed is for "2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines".
- Eberspacher; Uwe - Berlin DE
- Eberspacher; Uwe - Memmingen DE
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| 4H-pyrrolo[3,2-c]pyridin-4-one derivatives Grant 11,339,157 - Siegel , et al. May 24, 2 | 2022-05-24 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines App 20200383991 - WORTMANN; Lars ; et al. | 2020-12-10 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines Grant 10,772,893 - Wortmann , et al. Sept | 2020-09-15 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines App 20180256591 - WORTMANN; Lars ; et al. | 2018-09-13 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines Grant 9,993,484 - Wortmann , et al. June 12, 2 | 2018-06-12 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines App 20170216304 - WORTMANN; Lars ; et al. | 2017-08-03 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines Grant 9,549,932 - Wortmann , et al. January 24, 2 | 2017-01-24 |
| 2-(morpholin-4-yl)-1,7-naphthyridines App 20160287604 - Wortmann; Lars ; et al. | 2016-10-06 |
| Towing vehicle for maneuvering aircraft Grant 5,860,785 - Eberspacher January 19, 1 | 1999-01-19 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 