loadpatents
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Early; James M..The latest application filed is for "variable stiffness striking implement".
Patent | Date |
---|---|
Variable stiffness striking implement Grant 10,646,761 - Early , et al. | 2020-05-12 |
Self-aligned antiblooming structure for charge-coupled devices and method of fabrication thereof Grant 5,118,631 - Dyck , et al. June 2, 1 | 1992-06-02 |
Ceramic package for high frequency semiconductor devices Grant 4,839,717 - Phy , et al. June 13, 1 | 1989-06-13 |
Means for reducing signal propagation losses in very large scale integrated circuits Grant 4,833,521 - Early May 23, 1 | 1989-05-23 |
Integrated circuit chip wiring arrangement providing reduced circuit inductance and controlled voltage gradients Grant 4,583,111 - Early April 15, 1 | 1986-04-15 |
Method for semiconductor memory testing Grant 4,335,457 - Early June 15, 1 | 1982-06-15 |
Dynamic reference voltage generator Grant 3,955,101 - Amelio , et al. May 4, 1 | 1976-05-04 |
Charge-coupled device with overflow protection Grant 3,896,485 - Early July 22, 1 | 1975-07-22 |
Charge Coupled Amplifier Grant 3,806,772 - Early April 23, 1 | 1974-04-23 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.