e-talk corporation
USPTO Trademark & Patent Filings
Trademark applications and grants for E-talk Corporation. E-talk Corporation has 2 trademark applications. The latest application filed is for "ETALK SOLUTION PROVIDER"
- Company Aliases
- e-talk corporation
- e-talk Corporation -
| State Incorporated | NEVADA |
| Entity Type | CORPORATION |
| Address | 4040 West Royal Lane, Suite 100 Irving, TEXAS UNITED STATES 750632825 |
Trademarks Patents
| Patent Application | Date |
|---|---|
| System and method for processing work according to an active work model 20030154241 - 10/072431 Nygren, Blair E. ; et al. | 2003-08-14 |
| System and method for implementing recording plans using a session manager 20030154240 - 10/071555 Nygren, Blair E. ; et al. | 2003-08-14 |
| System and method for reproducing a video session using accelerated frame playback 20020106190 - 09/751039 Nygren, Blair E. ; et al. | 2002-08-08 |
Mark Image Registration | Serial | Trademark Application Date |
|---|---|
"ETALK SOLUTION PROVIDER" 2922027 76503856 |
ETALK SOLUTION PROVIDER 2003-04-04 |
"E-TALKING" 75927794 |
E-TALKING 2000-02-24 |
| CAGE Code | 34BP3 | E-TALK CORPORATION GOVERNMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 