Dykema; Scott E.
Patent Applications and Registrations
Patent applications and USPTO patent grants for Dykema; Scott E..The latest application filed is for "asymmetric tibial components for a knee prosthesis".
- Dykema; Scott E. - Warsaw IN
| Patent | Date |
|---|---|
| Asymmetric tibial components for a knee prosthesis Grant 9,381,090 - Wentorf , et al. July 5, 2 | 2016-07-05 |
| Assembly system for orthopedic components Grant 8,608,751 - Cronin , et al. December 17, 2 | 2013-12-17 |
| Tibial augments for use with knee joint prostheses Grant 8,506,645 - Blaylock , et al. August 13, 2 | 2013-08-13 |
| Asymmetric Tibial Components For A Knee Prosthesis App 20130024001 - Wentorf; Mary S.S. ; et al. | 2013-01-24 |
| Femoral resection alignment tool Grant D651,318 - Cronin , et al. December 27, 2 | 2011-12-27 |
| Modular plate and keel provisionals Grant 7,691,150 - Cronin , et al. April 6, 2 | 2010-04-06 |
| Modular Plate And Keel Provisionals App 20080147203 - Cronin; Shaun R. ; et al. | 2008-06-19 |
| Assembly System For Orthopedic Components App 20080147196 - Cronin; Shaun R. ; et al. | 2008-06-19 |
| Modular tibial implant with a mortise coupling App 20060195196 - Pendleton; John E. ; et al. | 2006-08-31 |
uspto.report is an independent third-party trademark research tool that is not affiliated, endorsed, or sponsored by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) or any other governmental organization. The information provided by uspto.report is based on publicly available data at the time of writing and is intended for informational purposes only.
While we strive to provide accurate and up-to-date information, we do not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, reliability, or suitability of the information displayed on this site. The use of this site is at your own risk. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk.
All official trademark data, including owner information, should be verified by visiting the official USPTO website at www.uspto.gov. This site is not intended to replace professional legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for consulting with a legal professional who is knowledgeable about trademark law.
| 